1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 109,626,37 with the Plaintiff, and 5% per annum from March 17, 2014 to January 17, 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is an air transport company, and the Plaintiff is a passenger on March 17, 2014, who was on the part of the Defendant Company’s DNA aircraft D (hereinafter “instant aircraft”) at the place of departure Incheon International Airport from the place of departure, the place of destination, and the Paris Warsaw at Paris (hereinafter “instant aircraft”).

Defendant C is a member of the Defendant Company, who was on board the aircraft of this case.

B. On March 17, 2014, about five hours after the aircraft take-off, the Plaintiff ordered the Defendant C to take-off (Korean visual criteria; hereinafter the same shall apply) around 17:40.

However, in the course of Defendant C’s transfer to the Plaintiff by putting his son B in a dispute, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the Plaintiff’s body, and the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as the front left, the part with the right-hand left, and the part with the negative 2 degrees image, etc.

C. On March 18, 2014, at around 00:50, the Plaintiff arrived at the Paris Warsaw Airport in France, and around 2 hours thereafter, on March 18, 2014, and returned to Korea after boarding the Defendant Company E aircraft around 03:00.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 14-16, Eul evidence 6-9, video, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the parties' arguments;

A. Plaintiff 1) In the course of providing Plaintiff 1, Defendant C left down the short side of the dispute with the face-to-face without having to cover the face-to-face in the process of providing Plaintiff 1. However, Defendant C lost its center by means of a string of the aircraft, etc. In addition, Defendant C did not take proper emergency measures such as getting off the Plaintiff’s bat, not helping the Plaintiff remove the fire promptly after the instant accident occurred, and not allowing the Plaintiff to receive prompt medical treatment. (2) Meanwhile, Defendant C did not have to take proper measures, such as preventing the Plaintiff from getting off the Plaintiff’s bat, and not allowing the Plaintiff to take prompt medical treatment. In addition, Defendant C’s bat on the aircraft of this case, the temperature at 80 degrees higher than that of other aircraft, thereby raising images to the Plaintiff.