[Defendant A]

1. The sentence against the accused shall be ten thousand won;

2.Provided, That this judgment has become final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is the de facto representative of the company B (hereinafter “B”) engaged in the special-presidential manufacturing business in Jin-si E in Jin-si.

On July 2016, the Defendant started to limit the maximum discretion of dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump (40 cubic meters, maximum 18,100 g) to the previous loaded quantity, and came to have no choice but to transport fump dump dump dump dump dump purchaser including F.

Accordingly, the Defendant tried to resolve a civil petition of the purchaser through dump merr's structural change, but after inquiring the Korea Transportation Safety Authority of the structural change that increases the load load in a normal way was not included in the subject of approval, and made it impossible for the Defendant to change the structure in a normal way. Despite the absence of any defect in the manufacturer's own at the time of release, the Defendant prepared documents as if the purchaser returned the above Trr to the purchaser on the ground of the manufacturing defect and replaced the new Trr, and made the purchaser to cancel the registration of the existing vehicle, and then, the Defendant dumpr's upper cover part of the Jrr's upper floor covered by the purchaser at the cost of KRW 150-180,00 and delivered the purchaser at the expense of the dumpr's dumpr's dump dumr's own weight to reduce the load load to the manufacturer's dump dumpr (32 metres, maximum 25,000 m.

A. According to the above public offering in violation of the Automobile Management Act by deletion of the chassis number, the Defendant’s operation B around November 2016.