(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.08 2015가단5050524

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.08 2015가단5050524

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 111,40,868 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from May 17, 2014 to July 8, 2016, and the following.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) On May 17, 2014, Twitler B, who was commissioned to transport construction equipment, is deemed to be Defendant Twitler at around 22:30 on May 17, 2014 (hereinafter “Defendant B”).

) The Plaintiff’s cirls was loaded with the Plaintiff’s cirls and stopped the Defendant cirr near the advertising board located in Gyeonggi-gun Group D. At that time, the Plaintiff, who had taken other vehicles from the said place, sent a water signal to the Defendant cirr to get out of the cirr to get out of the cirr and was on board the back part of the Defendant cirr. B, even though the Plaintiff was different in the cirr to get out of the cirr’s back part to get out of the cirr to get out of the cirr’s back part to get out of the cirr’s back of the cirr. Such negligence caused the Plaintiff’s death of the cirrrr’s back part to the back part of the Defendant cirr, resulting in the Plaintiff’s injury, such as the mouth of the cirr body part, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant Leper.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, 10 (including branch numbers if there are branch numbers), Eul evidence 1, 3, 4 and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts, the defendant, who is an insurer, is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.

C. Whether liability is limited or not, however, the Plaintiff is also responsible for promoting the safety of the Plaintiff’s own. The Plaintiff was erroneous in failing to clearly communicate the Plaintiff’s intent to board the cherb to get the cherb to the back part of the Defendant cherb in order to get off the cherb from the back part of the Defendant cherb, and such error contributed to the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damages. Therefore, the Defendant’s liability is limited to 80% in consideration of

2. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, the calculation shall be the same as each corresponding item in the separate list of damages calculation.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2018.01.30 2017가단308381

-창원지방법원 2017.02.07 2015나35427

-전주지방법원 2014.08.22 2014고단840

-대전지방법원 서산지원 2018.02.01 2017고단813

-창원지방법원 2016.09.02 2015가단72166