logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.06.19 2019고단1949
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 7, 2019, at around 04:50, the Defendant discovered a e-mail car owned by the victim D, which was parked at the Daegu-gu Seoul-gu B lending Cdong parking lot. On March 7, 2019, the Defendant opened a string door door that was not corrected by the creb that the victim was under the influence of alcohol at the back seat of the said car and carried a b.5 million won of cash, which is owned by the victim and carried out by the victim on the b.5 million won.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. On April 8, 2019, around 05:38, the Defendant discovered a HM3 car owned by the victim G, which was parked in the parking lot of the building in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and opened an unrecepted driver’s seat and opened a door to the unrecepted driver’s seat and kept it, the Defendant owned KRW 10,000,000 and USD 86.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

3. On April 12, 2019, at around 02:35, the Defendant discovered LK5 car owned by the victim K, which was parked in the Jdong parking lot of the building J-dong, Daegu-gu I, and opened an unrecepted driver’s seat and opened an unrecepted driver’s seat and carried approximately KRW 115,00,000, cash owned by the victim who was kept in custody.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in D, G, or K;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure lists;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Considering that the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes include: (a) the fact that the Defendant had been sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for the same kind of crime; (b) the Defendant again committed the instant crime despite the fact that the Defendant had been sentenced to imprisonment; and (c) no particular measures to recover from damage until now; and (d) the fact that the Defendant is led to the confession of the crime and the fact that

arrow