logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.01.11 2016고정2746
주민등록법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 5, 2016, from around 22:20 on September 5, 2016 to around 22:26 on the same day, the Defendant demanded employees E to present his/her identification card to the Defendant at the location of the “D” club located in Suwon-gu C, Suwon-si, and presented to the above E as if the Defendant’s resident registration certificate was the Defendant’s resident registration certificate.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration certificate unlawfully.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E, F and G;

1. Article 37 of the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and subparagraph 8 of the Act on the Registration of Residents of the Selection of Punishment (Selection of Penalty)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order. The defendant did not intend to unlawfully use another person's resident registration certificate at the time of the instant case, but the principal of the resident registration certificate was in a club with the mind that the defendant did not enter

Twit clubs employees are entitled to return their clubs to the host employees, and their line of duty is limited, so it does not constitute a crime.

The argument is asserted.

However, the following facts, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the evidence mentioned above and all the circumstances revealed in the proceedings of this case, namely, E and G, who are club employees, were four persons working for the defendant, but the defendant was refused to report slots, and only two persons were present during the day, and thereafter, the defendant was at the entrance of a club again with one other (math) reported due to other believers, and the defendant confirmed the identification card as presented by the defendant after checking the identification card of a man, and confirmed the identification card as presented by the defendant because the face of the resident registration certificate and the face of the defendant are too different.

the Commission.

It makes the same statement, and E makes the statement to the police that the defendant was the subject of his/her resident registration certificate after making the report call, and that he/she made the speech and behavior.

arrow