1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 12, 1981, the Plaintiff was appointed as a local administrative secretary in Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Jin-do, and served as a local administrative secretary, a local administrative assistant, a local administrative assistant, a local administrative assistant, and a member of Sung-gun, and retired on July 18, 2016.

B. On July 19, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical treatment in the line of official duties with the Defendant on the ground that “the Defendant was diagnosed by mental distress (e.g., stress disorder; hereinafter “the instant injury”) due to the mental shock that occurred several times in the course of fighting at the housing fire site or forest fire site in the course of fighting.” However, on August 5, 2016, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s application on the ground that “the instant injury and disease did not have a proximate causal relation with the official duties” against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed a request for review with the Public Official Pension Review Committee, but was dismissed on December 28, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, 6, Eul evidence No. 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. On October 7, 201, the Plaintiff asserted that he/she had been employed as the head of Sung-gun D, the Plaintiff instructed to increase the mental weakness after he/she had been under command at the housing fire site within his/her jurisdiction. On December 20, 201, the Plaintiff thereafter performed fighting work at the housing fire site on December 11, 201, the forest fire fire fire site on December 11, 201, and the housing fire site on November 18, 2013.

In particular, during the housing fire site on November 18, 2013, the body of the shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot sel sel sel sel sel sel sel selb

Therefore, even though the plaintiff had caused the injury and disease of this case due to the shock during the performance of official duties, it was done by the defendant on a different premise.