1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 9, 1989, the Plaintiff was appointed as two kinds of local employees as a local office worker, etc., and was employed as a local office worker. On December 28, 2012, the Plaintiff was transferred on March 20, 2013 to the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, in accordance with the Defendant’s personnel order from March 20, 2013 to the Defendant’s personnel order. The Plaintiff was appointed as a local office worker as a local office worker under the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (administrative Grade 8) on June 28, 2013.

B. On February 18, 2014, the Plaintiff, such as a disciplinary resolution and disposition, pointed out that D in the process of obtaining approval of the official document “to submit the results of safety inspection, such as a steep slope in 2014,” which is a superior in the residents’ living room in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, P.S., the Plaintiff did not correct the official document while stating that D in charge of the above administrative officer D did not make a false official document and issued a duty order to require D to deal with the work to be carried out together with the former employee. Since D is 13, the person in charge instructed D to be able to deal with it, and that he tried to do violence by verbal abuse, such as “I ambling the front of the said community service center,” and citing and threatening the closed light in front of the horse community service center.

1) On March 4, 2013, the Defendant rendered a request for disciplinary action against the Plaintiff on the ground that the chairperson of the Changwon-si Personnel Committee for Changwon-si Personnel Committee violated the duty of good faith and the duty to maintain dignity under Articles 48 and 55 of the Local Public Officials Act as follows. 2) The chairperson of the relevant Personnel Committee notified the Plaintiff of the opening and attendance of the Personnel Committee on March 7, 2014, but the Plaintiff refused to receive the notice of attendance on two occasions on March 5, 2014 and March 10, 2014, and received it on March 11, 2014.

3. On March 14, 2014, the above personnel committee shall hear the Plaintiff’s statement and review it.