1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 17, 2013, the Plaintiff, as a patrol staff for the police box B police box of the Sungsung Branch, driven the patrol boat around 10:05, and stopped in the front of the crosswalk while carrying out the patrol, and was sentenced to the traffic signal at the crosswalk, following the Plaintiff’s patrol staff.

(hereinafter referred to as "the accident of this case". (b)

On November 28, 2013, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “Woman’s salt, tension, 5-6, and 6-7 of the Gyeongscis,” and applied for medical care for official duties to the Defendant on November 28, 2013.

C. On December 5, 2013, the Defendant approved the Plaintiff on medical treatment for official duties with respect to “satisf and tensions of satisfum” among the above applicants’ disease, and granted the Plaintiff non-approval on the ground that there was no causal link between official duties and official duties with respect to “satch escape certificates of satisfump signboards No. 5-6 in the background, postmpicisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisf

(hereinafter referred to as “this case’s disposition”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, entry of Gap 6 and 7 evidence

2. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. Before the instant accident, the Plaintiff did not receive any treatment for the congratulations, and worked normally without any particular reason. After the instant accident, the Plaintiff complained of serious pains, such as a hump and hump, etc.

The plaintiff's main intention is about 70% of the outbreak rate due to external wounds because it is not severe to change the state of the decline of side signboards.

B. In light of these circumstances, there was a change in the Plaintiff’s departure from office.

Even if the existing disease was rapidly aggravated due to the above accident, and the disease of this case occurred, the defendant's disposition of this case is unlawful.

3. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Facts of recognition, medical opinion Gap 1 to 7, and Eul 1 to 5, and the purport of this court's entrustment of medical record appraisal to the head of the Gangseo-hee University Hospital, and the whole purport of the pleadings as a result of fact inquiry.