1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The title of the patented invention (A) invention of this case: The name of the patented invention of this case (a) invention of this case: the gap between the base board and its manufacturing method 2)/ the filing date/registration date/patent number: the patent right on September 9, 2010 / the patent right on July 5, 2012 / the patent right on July 5, 2012: Defendant 4) / the claims / 165158 / the patent right on July 3, 2012 / the claims / the first phase (hereinafter “Composition 1”; the above / the two steps (hereinafter “Composition 2”; the two steps (hereinafter “1”; the characteristics of the two steps (1); the two steps), the two steps (1); the two steps (1); the two steps (1); the two steps (1); the two steps (2); the two steps) of the first step) and the first step of the list; and (3) the description of the two steps (1); the two steps (1); the two step in which are included in the two different direction; : the two steps (1); and the two (3) the two different.

B. The invention subject to confirmation (attached Form 2) (attached Form 3) concerns the Defendant’s specific “the gap between the base board and the manufacturing method thereof,” and the description and drawings are as shown in attached Form 2.

C. In the instant case involving the cited inventions, the Plaintiff finally organized the claim to the effect that the challenged invention constitutes a free-to-work technology that can be easily implemented pursuant to the cited Invention 4, 6-8, and 10. Accordingly, as seen below, the Plaintiff omitted a description of the cited Invention 1 (Evidence 4), 2 (Evidence 5), 3 (Evidence 5), 5 (Evidence 6), and 9 (Evidence 12) that are not used in comparison with the challenged Invention 4, 6-8, and 10.

On the other hand, among the cited inventions, the devices described in the Utility Model Gazette, not the actual invention, or photographs posted on the Internet Blogs, are included. However, in comparison with the patented invention in this case, the term "invention" is called "for convenience."