1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The name of the invention claimed in this case (No. 1) 1: the filing date and the application number of the display device 2: on December 15, 2009 / No. 10-2009-125017 3): the applicant: Plaintiff 4 (amended on April 9, 2014) claims (the amended on April 9, 2014) / 1 of claims / non-label 1 of claims and non-label 1 of the said non-label : The above non-label 1 of the two adjacent to each other (hereinafter referred to as “Composition 1”); the one of the two pages of the above non-label 2 of the two pages ; the one of the above non-label 2 of the two specifications / the one of the two specifications / the one of the two specifications / the one of the two specifications / the one of the two specifications / the one of the two specifications / the one of the two specifications / the two specifications / the one of the two specifications / the two specifications / the above.

B. Cited Invention 1 (Evidence No. 9) With regard to the "emulsion display device" published in the Japanese Patent Gazette No. 10-11517, which was published on April 28, 1998, published on the basis of the comparisond Invention 1 (Evidence No. 9) and the main contents and drawings thereof are as shown in attached Form 2 (Evidence No. 10). 2) The main contents and drawings of the comparable Invention 2 (Evidence No. 10-2005-6030, published on June 22, 2005, are related to the "electronic device with the "plex display display board" published on June 22, 2005, and the main contents and main drawings are as shown in attached Form 3.

C. (1) On December 18, 2013, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office had ordinary knowledge in the art to which the invention pertains, and on December 18, 2013, the Plaintiff had ordinary knowledge in the entire art to which the invention pertains before filing the application.