beta
Text
1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on July 18, 2014 on the case No. 1357 shall be revoked.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The title of the patented invention 1) invention: The name of the patented invention in this case: The date of application and its manufacturing method 2)/registration number: the date of September 9, 2010 / the date of registration / (1651583): the patentee: the claim 4) / the claim / the patent holder / the one stage (hereinafter referred to as “Composition 1”; the above step (hereinafter referred to as “Composition 1”; the two steps (hereinafter referred to as “Composition 2”; and the two steps (hereinafter referred to as “Composition 2); and the two steps (hereinafter referred to as “the two steps”) to arrange the upper part of the upper part of the upper part so that the lower part of the upper part may be exposed to a certain width at a specified interval; and the two steps (hereinafter referred to as “satising 3); depending on one side of the upper part of the lower part, the composition of the upper part and the third part of the fourth part of the invention in this case should be included in the direction of the lower part and the lower part.
【Request 1, 2, 2, 4-2, 4-2, 11-2, 5-2: The main drawings of the invention subject to confirmation are as shown in [Attachment 1]. (b) The invention subject to confirmation is related to “the flag gap and the manufacturing method thereof,” and its explanation and drawings (attached Form 2) are as follows. (c) The main text of the decision is as to “the manufacturing process of the foundation of the foundation of the foundation of the foundation of the foundation of the foundation.” (d) The Plaintiff, the patentee of the patented invention of this case, claimed against the Defendant on May 24, 2013, seeking confirmation that “the invention subject to confirmation falls under the scope of the right of the patented invention of this case” (attached Form 3).
2. The Patent Tribunal's "Invention 18, 2014" has different ways to arrange, form, and cut metal boxes. Thus, the defendant's invention is confirmed.