A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 16, 2015, the Defendant forged a private document stating the content of the contract that the Defendant acquires the right and obligation to the business of E (State) by means of a computer in the form of the contract that he/she received on the Internet, using a computer located in the D office located in Yansan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Yandong-si, with the title of “A contract for business transfer and acquisition”, and marked the “A” as the representative F of E (State) and affixed the said F seal that he/she had obtained in advance on his/her name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a copy of the business transfer/acquisition contract in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations without authority.

2. On June 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) exercised the instant investigation document as if it was a document duly formed with the agreement on the transfer and takeover of the forged business at the mutual infinite shop located in the Yasan-gu, Yasan-si, Jeonju-si, G, who was aware of the forgery.

3. On June 16, 2015, the fraud Defendant: (a) entered into a contract with the modern world while operating the E agency, and (b) sought to take over E in 320 million won.

The amount of KRW 120 million out of the acquisition fund is KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000.

The remainder of 100 million won is responsible for the proposal and 8 million won each month, and the company will be paid to E through 12 months from July 2016, and the company will be acquired in the name of the v.g. on July 2016.

On June 18, 2015, the 50th 50th 50th 50th 7th 7th 7th 50th 50th 50th 6th 6th 18th 2015, the above coffee shop presented a forged business transfer/acquisition contract to the victim as described in the above paragraph (1).

However, as the defendant bears a large amount of debt at the time, it is thought that he will use the money received from the injured party as debt repayment and cost of living.