The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the president of a reconstruction association from August 2014 to C.

On January 22, 2016, the Defendant received a certificate of information disclosure on the list of union members and the list of landowners (excluding resident registration numbers), the agreement of a collaborative company and the details of funding execution, the general meeting of the association’s reconstruction project, the board of directors, the copy of the stenographic records, the audit report, and the detailed receipt of monthly funds from E, who are union members of the said association, at the office of the Daegu-gu Association, Daegu-gu. D around January 2, 2016, the Defendant did not comply with the request for copy of the remaining documents and data except for the list of union members and the list of landowners, within 15 days after the receipt of

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a statement of inquiry about facts (a separate accounting corporation);

1. Article 86 Subparag. 6 of the relevant Act and Articles 86 and 81 Subparag. 6 of the former Act on the Maintenance of the Urban and Residential Environments (Amended by Act No. 13508, Sep. 1, 2015) on criminal facts;

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (the defendant is late);

The judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel, including the fact that the documents requested by E were copied, that E did not want to be punished against the defendant, and that the defendant is the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment, and that there was no record of criminal punishment before and after the crime of this case) and the documents requested by E were left to the accounting corporation for the purpose of accounting audit, and thus, the defendant and his defense counsel could not respond to the request by E. Thus, the documents requested by E were left to the accounting corporation for the purpose of accounting audit, and thus, it does not constitute a crime by blocking illegality.