logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.02.03 2016고정758
도시및주거환경정비법위반
Text

Punishment on the accused shall be determined by a fine of KRW 800,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The chairperson of the urban environmental improvement project promotion committee shall comply with the request within 15 days, where a person who owns land, etc. requests perusal of the list of landowners, etc., the list of partners, the list of landowners, etc., and related data.

1. The Defendant refused to comply with the request on October 12, 2015 and October 15, 2015, despite the receipt of a written request from the owner of the land, etc. and the owner of the land, etc., such as G and H, to facilitate mutual communication, the Defendant did not comply with the said request within 15 days, even though he/she received a written request from the chairperson of the Reconstruction Promotion Committee, which is the chairperson of the building promotion committee, and from the owner of the land, etc., such as G and H, in the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City F and the second floor E reconstruction Promotion Committee office around October 12, 2015.

2. The Defendant refused to request on October 27, 2015, as the chairperson of the Reconstruction Promotion Committee, and the head of the reconstruction promotion committee office described in paragraph (1) around October 27, 2015 requested in writing that “the list of owners of land, etc. excluding resident registration numbers to verify the factual relations of the owners of land, etc. and the list of members of the association” from those who own land, etc., G and H, etc., including G and H, but did not comply with the request of H, even though he/she received a written request from the owner of the land, etc.

3. The Defendant’s refusal to request on November 23, 2015 is the chairperson of the Reconstruction Promotion Committee as the chairperson of the E-building Promotion Committee, and on November 23, 2015, the Defendant did not comply with the request of the owner of land, etc. by refusing reproduction of residential information, such as land, despite the receipt of a written request from the owner of the land, etc., such as G and H, in the E reconstruction Promotion Committee’s office as indicated in paragraph (1) around November 23, 2015, stating that “the request is made by copying and changing documents on the list of land, etc. except resident registration numbers to verify the actual relations between the owner

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow