The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Determination of the facts that the defendant made a confession of the crime of this case while committing the crime of this case, the health of his/her dependent, such as the defendant and his/her spouse, seems to be very poor. However, in light of addiction to narcotics and harm caused by medication, narcotics crimes need to be strictly punished and eradicated. The defendant has the record of punishment for the same crime of this case, in particular, again commits the crime of this case even though he/she had been punished 12 times due to the same crime, in spite of the fact that he/she again committed the crime of this case, the number of phiphonephones handled by the defendant is not large, the degree of addiction of the defendant's cellphones seems to be less than 1.5 to 2.5m in length, the number of years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime of this case is less than 6 years, the number of years, the number of years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime of this case and the number of years recommended crimes of this case under the sentencing guidelines of the court below, considering favorable circumstances for the defendant.