The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year and two months of imprisonment) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant has such favorable circumstances as the confession of the crime of this case, the confession of the crime of this case to the defendant, the statement to the narcotics supplier (one top line) who provided phiphones to the defendant at an investigative agency, etc. (Provided, That it does not reach an important investigation cooperation, and there is a family member who will support the crime of this case as the most. However, the crime of this case is found not only to arrange the trade of phiphones at the request of another narcotics offender but also to provide phiphones to another narcotics offender, and it is necessary to strictly punish and eradicate narcotics crimes in light of the addiction and harm caused by medication of narcotics, etc. In particular, it is necessary to arrange the sale and purchase of the crime of this case from among the crimes of this case, in order to facilitate the illegal distribution of narcotics and to place them to drug addiction within the scope of 3 years by linking them with the narcotics supplier and the consumers, and the defendant has already been sentenced to aggravated punishment for the same kind of crime of this case for 13 years beyond the sentencing guidelines of this case.