The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, and additional collection) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Determination: The defendant reflects the crime of this case at the latest, while there are favorable circumstances such as the age of the defendant's age. On the other hand, narcotics crimes should be eradicated as a very serious crime that causes not only the criminal but also destroy his family and society, and also cause other crimes. The defendant has the record of 10 times punishment for the same crime, and the defendant commits each of the crimes of this case within 2 to 3 months from the date of release, as well as the record of 10 times punishment for the same crime. The court below did not seem to have any specific record of the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court on the crime of this case, such as the scope of recommendation [basic crime: (b) and (c) of the punishment of this case; (a) the punishment of this case; (c) the recommended punishment of the defendant for the basic crime of this case; (d) the punishment of this case; (e) the number of years before and after six years of imprisonment with prison labor; (e) the punishment of this case is not more than 1 year and six years of imprisonment with prison labor; (iii or more than six (3) years of imprisonment with prison labor.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.