A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding seven thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

From October 20, 2012 to October 23, 2012, the Defendant operated an “officetel” in the name of “C” under the name of “C”, “Seoul-si Btel 805, Seocheon-gu, Busan-si,” and placed the Masp and Masp and Masp, etc. on the said office, and employed female employees D over the said period.

The Defendant received 80,000 won per man in return for sexual traffic from two male descendants who found the above business establishment during the above period, and caused D to do the same act of similarity in a way that helps the male grandchildren take the sexual flag of the male grandchildren as hand and helps them see the scams under the above, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. A investigation report (verification of the location of a business establishment engaging in sexual traffic in this officetel);

1. Investigation report (verification of the names of subscribers to mobile phones for business use A);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., imprisonment and fines concurrently;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order provides that the crime of this case was committed immediately after the summary order became final and conclusive in spite of the fact that the defendant had a record of being sentenced to a fine due to the same type of crime, but the defendant seems not to repeat the crime of this case, and the execution of imprisonment with prison labor is suspended considering the size of the business of this case, business period, profits accrued therefrom, the defendant's power, etc. However, the execution of the crime of this case is not possible, but instead, the corresponding economic profits equivalent thereto are not collected.