A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 5,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from around September 10, 2012 to October 12, 2012, operated a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of the Young-si, Young-si, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, and provided five rooms used for sexual traffic, and employed d workers engaged in sexual traffic over the above period.

The Defendant received 70,000 won per capita in return for the sexual traffic from the male grandchildren on an average of 3 to 5 persons per day who had found the above business establishment during the above period, and had the above D dominate the male grandchildren, and had them do the act of similarity in a way that helps the male grandchildren knife with their sexual organ and traces below, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. A written statement of E and F;

1. Commercial lease contract;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., imprisonment and fines concurrently;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment does not mean that the crime of this case was committed in spite of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case even though he had the record of being sentenced to a fine due to the crime of this case. However, the defendant's intent not to repeat again after the disposition of the business place of this case is shown, and the execution of imprisonment is suspended considering the size of the business place of this case, the business period, the profits accrued therefrom, the family environment of the defendant, and the power of the defendant. However, the execution of the crime of this case is deemed to be necessary to deprive him of economic benefits corresponding to the crime of this case, instead of collecting the profits accurately, it is deemed that there is a need to deprive him of economic benefits corresponding to