logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 대전고등법원 2007. 7. 6. 선고 2006나11515 판결
[소유권이전등기말소등][미간행]
Plaintiff and appellant

National Bank of Korea (Seoul Law Firm, Attorney Kim Jong-soo, Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

CB Industry Development Co., Ltd. and two others (Attorney Kim Young-chul, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Conclusion of Pleadings

May 18, 2007

The first instance judgment

Cheongju District Court Decision 2005Gahap3202 Decided September 15, 2006

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance court shall be revoked. (1) As to the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, the decision of the first instance court shall be revoked. (1) As to the real estate indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, the payment contract concluded on August 20, 2004 between the defendant DB Development Co., Ltd. and the defendant DB Construction Co., Ltd., (b) the defendant DB Construction Co., Ltd. completed the procedure for cancellation of ownership transfer registration completed on August 23, 2004 as the receipt of No. 11526 on August 23, 2004 to the defendant DB Construction Co., Ltd.; and (337, Sep. 23, 2004; (2) The defendant DB Development Co., Ltd. added the procedure for cancellation of ownership transfer registration to the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 to the plaintiff as the registration office of the Chuncheon District Court No. 9592, Jul. 22, 1996>

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for this Court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) Each statement of Gap evidence Nos. 12 through 18 (including each number) submitted by the plaintiff as principal evidence at the trial of the court is not sufficient to reverse the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, (including the list in attached Form).

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and all appeals against the defendants shall be dismissed in its entirety. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Gangnam-gu (Presiding Judge) Kim Jong-won

arrow