Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in a D bus driving service.

On November 7, 2016, around 23:30 on November 23:30, 2016, the Defendant stated only “the point of accident” in the bill of indictment in front of the F gas station located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul. However, according to the prosecutor’s simple mistake, it appears to have been recorded as a result of the prosecutor’s simple mistake, and there is no risk that the point of accident is the same place, and that there is no substantial disadvantage in exercising the Defendant’

B from the high-priced direction of movable property in the Goyang-si Seoul Metropolitan Government, the speed of 40 km per hour in the direction of the Gu wave in Eunpyeong-gu.

At the time, weather conditions are night and the surface is sucked, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering room and the steering gear and accurately manipulating the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and got the victim G (the remaining, 50 years old) who was in the exclusive lane for the central bus due to negligence, and received the part of the front bus.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on January 2, 2017, resulting in the death of the victimized person due to the pulmonary cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral eption in the International Hospital Hospital H in Gyeyang-gu, Youngyang-gu, Youngyang-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. A survey report on actual condition (report on the occurrence of a traffic accident);

1. Report on internal investigation (the results of a field investigation, the verification of black stuff images, and CCTV at the site);

1. A death certificate;

1. The CCTV images and field photographs of route buses (the defendant and his defense counsel could not find the victim up to the shock of this case, and even if the defendant could have discovered the victim prior to the shock of this case, he could have discovered the victim.

Even though it is argued that there is no negligence on the defendant, it is an inevitable accident that could not avoid shock due to the distance of official customs, etc., but this court has adopted and investigated it legally.