logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.11.17 2017고단1804
특수공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:30 on March 13, 2017, the Defendant received 112 reports that “I am in order to a certain person,” and called “I am in order to make himself/herself correct, I am in a police box of the Jinjin Police Station,” and “I am in order to die, I am in order to do so.”

Does it be equal to the number of days of death in the Republic of Korea;

“Along with the same attitude as “at the time”, a police official carried dangerous objects and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported case by the said E, who is a police official, in turn.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Each photograph;

1. Video CDs;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol and the statutes on the list of seizure;

1. Article 144(1) and Article 136 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (from June to June 1) (i.e., interference with performance of official duties and coercion of duties) (i.e., special sentencing person] [decision of sentence] in light of the form of crime and the degree of interference with official duties, the issue is grave, the damage is not recovered, the crime is dead, the fact that the crime is dead, the first crime is being committed, and the fact that it appears to be an contingent crime, and the punishment is determined as ordered in the instant case, taking into account the various conditions of sentencing as indicated in the instant trial proceedings.

arrow