logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.09.30 2019가단5021913
구상금
Text

1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 29,038,407 won and 5% per annum from April 28, 2017 to September 30, 2019.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) On September 2, 2015, the Plaintiff is the Gyeyang-gu Incheon apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

) The council of occupants' representatives (hereinafter referred to as the "council of occupants' representatives of this case").

) The insurance period and the E Insurance Contract (hereinafter “Plaintiff Insurance Contract”) from September 4, 2015 to September 4, 2016.

(2) On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s insurance contract is a fire insurance-cum-special agreement that the owner of a special building under the Act on the Indemnification for Fire-Caused Loss and the Purchase of Insurance Policies requires compulsory subscription.

B. Defendant B is the owner of the instant apartment building F (hereinafter “instant partitioned building”). Around May 2014, Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) concluded a G insurance contract on the instant partitioned building (hereinafter “Defendant B’s insurance contract”). According to the Defendant’s insurance contract, the Defendant Co., Ltd. was liable for damages caused by the occurrence of a fire in the instant partitioned building, or the occurrence of a fire in the instant partitioned building, thereby incurring legal liability.

C. (1) On February 28, 2016, a fire at the small room of the instant sectional ownership building (hereinafter “instant fire”) around 04:37.

(2) The apartment building of this case, other than the building of this case and the above partitioned building, was partially destroyed, and the household tool in the partitioned building was destroyed, and the apartment building of this case was destroyed by the corridor 3 and 4 in the apartment of this case, and there was a loss such as delayed flow into another partitioned building. (2) The apartment of this case, other than the building of this case and the above partitioned building, caused the following losses.

Part of the building of this case 27,953,443 Gagdo-gu 22,386,586 Gagdo-gu 29,96,442 Gagdo-gu 7,891,420 Gagdo-gu 7,891,420 Gagdo-gu 27,953,443 Gagdo-gu

D. On the other hand, the Plaintiff is dissatisfied with this Opinion.

arrow