logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2012.11.01 2012고단1380
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant operated the “C”, which is mainly engaged in the import, supply, etc. of raw materials, as set forth in Section B 1803 of the building B in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, and was in the state of financial deterioration due to the failure to receive KRW 120 million from the Chinese business partner at the time of May 201, and was in the state of excess of the obligation, such as having the obligation to pay for the goods of KRW 160 million from D and two other businesses, and was in mind to receive the original intent from the victim E despite having no intention or ability to pay for the original cost.

1. On September 201, 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at the above C Office, stating, “The Defendant shall deliver the original will to F, Seo-gu Daejeon Daejeon, Daejeon, to purchase the original will, and the price will be paid by the end of the following month.”

However, in the above circumstances, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even after receiving the original intention from the victim.

As above, the Defendant was supplied by the victim with an original intent equivalent to KRW 3,755,846 at the market price on the 27th of the same month.

2. On October 1, 201, the Defendant called the victim at the above place and delivered the original intent to the “G branch of the Daegu Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G branch,” and the price will be paid by the end of the following month.

A false statement was made. However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he was supplied with the original intent from the victim in the foregoing circumstances. The Defendant received the original intent equivalent to KRW 2,222,708 at the market price from the victim’s above G branch in the above G branch. 3. On October 7, 2011, the Defendant called the victim at the above place and delivered the original intent to the “Seuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, Daejeon,” and the price would be paid by the end of the following month.

‘False speech' was made.

However, in the above circumstances, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even after receiving the original intention from the victim.

The Defendant is as above.

arrow