beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2018 Highest 2628"
1. On September 1, 2017, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would pay the amount by October 15, 2017, if the Defendant continued to supply the original group, at the D office operated by the Victim C, the Defendant sent the victim “a company that had been previously employed was retired and the individual business operator was retired,” and that the Defendant would pay the amount by not later than 15,000.”
However, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to pay the price until the date of the promise even if he received the original return from the victim.
As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received original parts of KRW 14,856,270, including the sum of KRW 14,857,270,00, from the F Co., Ltd. located at the time of Ansan from the victim, which was supplied on September 12, 2017, 144km land 1,702km on September 14, 2017, 201, 1,717, 26 September 26, 2017, and 100 kilograms land 1,856,270, etc. on September 26, 2017.
2. On October 1, 2017, the Defendant told the victim to pay the price by the end of October 2017, the Defendant supplied to F Co., Ltd. and G, Inc., which is located in the city of Ansan of 1,332 km, 5,377 km, by phoneing the victim.
However, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to pay the price until the date of the promise even if he received the original return from the victim.
As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained from the victim the victim, KRW 1,332 km on October 10, 2017, KRW 1,737 Gag on October 16, 2017, KRW 28,785,042 Gag on October 24, 2017 from each stock company F, KRW 1,737 Gag on October 24, 2017, KRW 740 Gag on October 26, 2017, KRW 1,140 Gag on October 30, 2017 from each of the supply from each of the stock companies G.
3. On November 8, 2017, the Defendant called “a request to deliver 1,680 km to G Co., Ltd. in order to pay all the cost that has not been settled by the payment by the payment by the payment by the payment by phone call from the victim.”
However, in fact, even if the defendant is supplied with the original unit by the victim, the defendant shall include the original unit price that was previously supplied.