logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1988. 3. 22. 선고 88도3 판결
[사기,업무상횡령,공문서위조,공문서위조행사,사문서위조,사문서위조행사][공1988.5.15.(823),732]
Main Issues

The meaning of the document aiding and determining criteria for the crime of forging private documents;

Summary of Judgment

The crime of forging a private document shall be established in such a way that it can be seen as a genuine private document prepared by the nominal owner in the form and appearance to the extent sufficient for the general public to enter it in the private document prepared by the nominal owner, and shall not necessarily require the signature or seal of the person in whose name the document is prepared. However, whether it is sufficient for the general public to enter it in the private document prepared by the genuine nominal owner shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the type and appearance of the document, as well as the type and contents of the document, and the function of the document in the general

[Reference Provisions]

Article 231 of the Criminal Act

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Prosecutor

Judgment of the lower court

Daegu High Court Decision 87No1331 delivered on November 26, 1987

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

We examine the prosecutor's grounds of appeal.

The crime of forging a private document shall be established if it is sufficient for the general public to enter the form and appearance to the extent that it can be seen as a genuine private document prepared by the nominal owner, and it does not necessarily require the signature or seal of the person under whose name the document is prepared. However, whether it is sufficient for the general public to enter the private document in the real name of the nominal owner should be determined by comprehensively taking into account the form and appearance of the document, as well as the type and content of the document, and the function of the document in the general transaction.

Therefore, the court below's finding that "the defendant was not guilty on December 22, 1986. 10:00" of the facts charged in the case of this case by using the paper of the sales contract for the vending machines which was acquired in advance from the Busan-dong Busan-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si-si-U.S.-U.S.-S.-dong-U.-dong-dong-U.-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-do-dong-dong-

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Yellow-il (Presiding Justice)

arrow
본문참조조문