logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2014.03.14 2013고정359
폭행등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

1. The Defendant is the Director of C Hospital, and D is the one who was the director of the same hospital.

At around 13:00 on September 26, 2012, the Defendant, at the conference room of the 9th floor of the C Hospital located in Siljin-si, the Defendant, on the ground that D did not agree to the horses of the Defendant on the case of the above director 7-8 of the C Hospital and the case of the above director 7-8 of the C Hospital, and D, on the ground that D did not agree to the horses of the Defendant, he expressed to D a large voice, “I saw several ages of the opening, the width, and the head of the Gu who was discharged to the width,” and continued to insult D, by speaking D as “new” at a large number of times depending on the victim who was living alone of the said nineth floor of the above hospital.

2. On September 26, 2012, the Defendant committed assaulting the Defendant at one time by taking D, etc. from the stairs between the second and third floors of the pertinent C Hospital on the same ground as that of paragraph 1.

2. The case is a crime falling under Articles 260(1) and 311 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's will under Articles 260(3) and 109(2) of the Criminal Act, or which can be prosecuted only upon the victim's complaint under Articles 260(3) and 109(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim D, after the public prosecution of this case was instituted, submitted a written withdrawal of complaint and a written application for non-prosecution of punishment to the court on March 12, 2014, and submitted the written application for withdrawal of complaint and the written application for non-prosecution of punishment to the court on March 12, 2014, may be recognized, and the defendant expressed his/her intent not to prosecute the defendant. Accordingly, the public prosecution against

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow