The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around 13:00 on November 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault by the victim D (33 years of age) who was a military official in charge of the Defendant’s children hospitalized at the above hospital, who did not abide by the time of the interview; and (b) expressed the Defendant’s her desire to “I will to see the Defendant’s flaps without this flaps flaps; and (c) flab the victim’s flaps.” on the ground that the Defendant flabeded the Victim’s flaps flaps, which reads “I will to flaps without this flab flaps; and (d) flabed the victim with the wall.”

2. In light of the judgment, the above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent in accordance with Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, on February 27, 2014, after the prosecution of this case, the victim D withdrawn the intent to punish the defendant.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.