beta본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.06.10 2015나7543
소유권말소등기
Text
1. The judgment of the first instance is modified as follows according to the selection of parties at the appellate court.
Plaintiff (Appointed Party).
Reasons
The reasoning for this Court’s judgment is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and such judgment is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
(However, since the appellate court was selected as a party, the Plaintiff A in the judgment of the first instance, “Plaintiff B,” “Plaintiff C,” “Plaintiff C,” “Plaintiff D,” “Appointed D,” and “Plaintiffs” respectively. Thus, the Plaintiff and the designated party’s claims are dismissed on the grounds that all of them are without merit.