logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.10.24 2013고단997
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant committed the following crimes under the status that the defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to stimulative disorder, etc.:

"2013 Highest 997"

1. Interference with business;

A. On March 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 14:40 on March 16, 2013, at the E-to-day restaurant operated by the victim D, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business for about 10 minutes, by putting the food and scambling on the customer’s house without any reason, and continuously putting the victim’s restaurant and 50 meters away from the victim’s house at a distance of 60 centimeters in length; and (b) continuously putting the victim’s entrance door door 2:3 times off to 2:3 times, and 2:3 times off the cambs on the front of the restaurant, and putting the cambs on the front floor of the restaurant, and obstructing the victim’s restaurant business for 10 minutes.

B. The Defendant

3. 23. 15:10 At around 15:10, the victim is found to be drunk in E-cafeteria operated by the victim.

Along with the fact reported by the police officer, it interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force for about five minutes until the police officer arrives at the site, such as where the food waste was collected on the cafeteria floor, and the cream is removed in his/her hand, which is deep on the cafeterias by the cafeterias.

C. On March 24, 2013, around 09:32, the Defendant found the victim under the influence of alcohol in the E cafeteria operated by the victim, and the victim was the victim.

The victim, who was dissatisfied with the reported matters as stated in the above paragraph, interfered with the victim's restaurant business for about five minutes by force, such as: (a) the victim was fluored with a large amount of fluorium "this fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor" and fluored red fluor’s disease in front of the restaurant; (b) fluoring the food dust in the fluor in front of the restaurant; and (c) fluoring the food dust in the fluor in the fluor.

The Defendant is under the influence of alcohol on March 24, 2013 at around 14:20 the E-cafeteria operated by the victim.

arrow