A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On August 22, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor due to interference with business at the Suwon Method Board, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Suwon Detention House on December 31, 2013.

1. On February 16, 2016, at around 04:20 on 04:20 on 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) sent to the victim the E cafeteria in the E cafeteria operated by the victim C; (b) on the ground that the victim’s order was not promptly given to the victim; and (c) on the ground that the victim’s order was not promptly given to the victim, the Defendant: (a) opened the door-to-door.

1.2.3.6.6.66.66.6.6.6.6.5.6.6.6.6.6.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's operation of the restaurant by force.

2. On February 16, 2016, around 09:30 on Feb. 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 20 minutes of the Victim F’s operation in the G, i.e., e., the victim F, who entered the victim’s facility in the G, without any reason; (b) and (c) bread the victim’s bath.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the operation of the victim's reformatory by force.

3. On February 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 19:30 on February 16, 2016, at the K cafeteria operated by the victim I, and (b) under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant continued to wear a 15 minutes of the 3rd floor of the said building, following the Defendant’s demand that “the third floor owner of the building is a person who has no relationship with us, and is likely to interfere with the restaurant; and (c) that “the third floor owner of the building will interfere with the restaurant.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's operation of the restaurant by force.

4. On March 12, 2016, around 15:20 on March 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed a desire to drive employees on the ground that employees do not bring the lawsuit; and (b) stated that employees do not take the lawsuit; and (c) stated that the Defendant is able to ask for alcohol, and that the Defendant is able to do so.