logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.11.11 2015고단5749
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, it is against the Defendants for 2 years from the date of the conclusion of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are joint operators of “G”, which are commercial sex acts establishments in the third floor of the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government.

On April 27, 2015, the Defendants invested an amount of money equivalent to KRW 20 million for each of the above businesses. Defendant A employed female sexual traffic in Thailand as an employee through Brazil, Defendant B operated both the business and the management of employees engaged in sexual traffic, and the profits therefrom are recruited by dividing them into KRW 50:50.

According to the above public offering, the Defendants introduced, on July 2015, a female with the name of "I" as "I", and through "I", a female with the name of "J" as "J", and on August 2015, the Defendants introduced the name "K" from a person with the nationality of Thailand as "K", respectively, and employed 70,00 won,80 won,80 won, and 150,000 won from customers as employees of sexual traffic by providing them with payment for sexual traffic, according to the method of sexual intercourse and time of sexual intercourse.

From July 2015 to September 8, 2015, Defendants employed the said L and N as their employees for about three days, and, from around August 20, 2015 to around September 8, 2015, the Defendants arranged commercial sex acts by engaging in commercial sex acts by raising sales equivalent to KRW 9,200,000,00 in total by receiving the amount of KRW 70,000 to KRW 1,50,000 from male customers who reported commercial sex acts to the Defendants, made contact with the Defendants, and continued commercial sex acts by receiving the amount of KRW 4,00,000 from 4 to 8 male customers every day during the said period.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Prosecutorial suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Police interrogation protocol of L/N;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure shall be governed by Acts and subordinate statutes;

arrow