logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.08.21 2020고단1195
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[200 Madan1195] The Defendant was a person who operated a commercial sexual traffic business with the trade name "C" in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul.

From September 26, 2019 to September 19:25, 2019, the Defendant had four rooms equipped with beds, etc., two shower rooms, two waiting rooms, one waiting room, and one camera, etc. The Defendant received 70,000 won from many unspecified male customers who reported commercial sex acts as compensation for sexual traffic, and assisted them to have sexual intercourse with the said male customers.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

[200 Highest 1865] The Defendant is a person who operated a commercial sexual traffic business with the trade name “F” at B and 3 Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu.

1. From April 20 to April 17, 2020, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) provided facilities such as four rooms, shower rooms, two shower rooms, one waiting room, one carter, etc. from around April 20, 202 to around April 17, 200, the Defendant arranged that an employee of Thailand, H (H, female, Is, and Thailand nationality), J (J, K, Thailand nationality), L (L, female, M&M, and Thland nationality) have an employee of Thailand to teach sexual intercourse with the above male sex.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any person having no status of sojourn;

Nevertheless, the Defendant employed the above H, J, and L as an employee of the above sexual traffic business establishment without status of stay at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

[200 Highest 1195]

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant concerning N in court statements;

1. The record of seizure and the list of seizure of the police statements P with respect to theO;

arrow