1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff at the trial of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations at the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's assertion even if the evidence submitted at the court of first instance and the evidence Nos. 5-1 and 2-2 submitted at the court of first instance and the result of the request for the supplementation of medical records to the head of the hospital at the time of this court, were examined again, it is reasonable

Therefore, the reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is that "this court" is "the court of first instance and this court", "the result of the request for examination of medical records" in the first instance judgment is "the result of the request for examination of medical records or the result of the request for the supplementation of medical records", and the second "this court" in the first instance judgment is the same as the reasons for the first instance judgment, except for the case where "the head of a hospital entrusted with (Supplement) appraisal by the court of first instance and this court" is "the designation of the head of the hospital entrusted with (Supplement) appraisal", and therefore, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act,

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.