logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.06.12 2017누84824
입찰참가자격제한 처분 취소청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the trial does not differ significantly from the argument in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's claim even if the evidence submitted by the court of first instance is examined together with the plaintiff's assertion, by re-examination of the statement of evidence No. 20 to No. 29, which was submitted in the

Therefore, the reasoning for this case is that the court's reasoning is that "execution: 6,043,50 won" in the "execution status of the ship repair expenses" in Part 5, 4, 500 of the judgment of the court of first instance, 5,000 won, "the balance: 45,214,125 won," "the balance: 46,214,125 won," "the evidence 1, 8, 19" in Part 7, 10 "No. 1, 8, 15, 19" in Part 1, 5, 5, 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the date of closing the argument of this case" in Part 5,00 "the date of closing the argument of the court of first instance" in Part 5,000 "the date of closing the argument of this case" in Part 1,043,500 won, and "the amount of 8,000 won "the amount of 1,00,000 won" in each.

The following "(q., even though the Plaintiff did not fulfill its obligations under the instant service contract, the Defendant’s notification of the termination of the instant service contract should be deemed to have accepted the Plaintiff’s request for termination and to have terminated the agreement (the Defendant did not comply with the procedure for termination prescribed in the instant service contract, such as notification of one month prior to the scheduled termination date).

In addition, "the request for an increase in the amount" of No. 6 of the 11 is ‘the request for an adjustment of the increased amount, i.e., the request for an adjustment of the increased amount, i.e. the request for an enforcement plan of No. 7' for No. 12.

arrow