logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.03.29 2017고단5974
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of five thousand won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A The business owner operating an officetel in the name of "F" in the name of "F" in the Gyeyang-gu E 4th, and the defendant B paid 30 million won rental deposit to the lessor to provide a place for the lessor to operate the above business, and repaid approximately 14 million won out of the above 30 million rental deposit to the defendant A, and agreed to receive a certain portion of the rental deposit of the above business establishment from the defendant A to receive distribution from the defendant A, and took charge of various duties, such as cleaning, etc.

From February 25, 2017 to March 27, 2017, the Defendants employed a female with Kazakh's nationality sexual traffic in the above business establishment, and received 140,000 won per time from the customer from the customer and caused the female sexual traffic to engage in sexual traffic and sexual intercourse or similar behavior over 90 times.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Partial statement of the witness A;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. On-site photographs, Red Seas, CCTV short-term photographs, copies of the lease agreement, and CCTV image photographs;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant B and the defense counsel of each investigation report

1. The summary of the assertion is written in order to assist the Defendant in cleaning at the instant business establishment, but there is no distribution or joint operation of operating profits, so there is no fact that the Defendant conspired with A to arrange sexual traffic.

2. The joint principal offender under Article 30 of the Criminal Act is jointly and severally committing a crime. In order for a joint principal offender to be established, the principal offender is required to have committed a crime through functional control based on a joint doctor as a subjective requirement, and the joint principal offender is one of the two others with a view to committing a specific criminal act by a joint doctor.

arrow