1. Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for one year and fine for 7,00,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment for eight months and Defendant C’s imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended execution, 2 years of protection observation, and 5 million won of fine at the Seoul Southern District Court on August 11, 2017, for a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, including the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (e.g., brokerage of commercial sex acts), and the above judgment was finalized on August 19, 2017. Defendant B was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a special assault in the same court on June 8, 2016, and 2 years of suspended execution, and the above judgment was finalized on March 18, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed by the Defendants with Defendant B as the lessee, set up five guest rooms, five guest waiting rooms, one toilet room for female sex trafficking, and one shower room, respectively, with the trade name of “I,” and each of them set up. The Defendants’ joint crime of this case is the business owner operating a so-called similar sexual intercourse business establishment by soliciting public relations (J’s trade name) and female sex trafficking through the Internet pornography site, and Defendant C managed public relations, female sex trafficking and sales on the condition of receiving monthly salary (2.5 million won). Defendant D and Defendant E received KRW 70,000 per day (70,000 won) on condition that they directly invested in the above promotional activities, customer guidance, sexual trafficking, female recruitment and management, etc., on condition that they receive rent from Defendant B, and Defendant B directly invested in the sale of 100,000 won and 108,000 won and 10,000 won.

A. On February 25, 2018, the Defendants violated the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic (such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic) are similar by receiving 40,000 won in return for similar sexual intercourse from K of male customers, which had been found to have reported the Internet advertisements by the Defendants around February 25, 2018, under the condition that they would give 20,000 won to Ls who are women engaged in sexual traffic employed by the Defendants, and allowing them to take charge of, or promptly assess the sexual organ of the said K.