logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.02.07 2017고정1590
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who uses Adi (ID) at a NAV (www.naver.com) portal site, or Adi (ID) at D, a computer hardware information site.

1. On March 10, 2017, around 13:44, NVV website “W.naver.com” on the bulletin board of the “SVAF” country.

GH’s title “N” is the middleest country I G H fraud.

A person who sells the body any other body, one of which is defective, and which is ambiguous.

I.I have the honor to open and block any defective good at any time;

Notice to mean “”;

2. 2017. 3. 11. 00:38 경 위 게시 글의 댓 글로 ‘ 판매자는 전자 물품인데도 상자에 뽁 뽁 이도 없고 신문지에만 싸 매서 택배상자로 보냈습니다

88,600

3. On March 11, 2017, around 01:55, whether “it is possible to receive refund for answers due to fraudulent change” on the D website bulletin board.

As the title "", a link may be made to see a bulletin posted on the above medium and high-class car page, and may not be refunded to the police station of this upper-class.

We are not able to ask questions.

“In order to defame the victim by posting a letter “,” the victim’s reputation was undermined by inserting false information via an information and communications network openly.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Although the defendant and his defense counsel posted the above article on the above date, it is true and is related to the public interest, and there is no purpose of slandering.

B. In determining whether the alleged facts are false in relation to the crime of defamation of relevant legal principles, if the material facts are consistent with objective facts in light of the overall purport of the alleged facts, it cannot be deemed that there is a false fact even if there is a little exaggeration or exaggeration in the detailed contents (specification) (see Supreme Court Decision 9, May 9, 2012).

arrow