1. The plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's claim expanded in the trial are dismissed, respectively.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) The Defendant entered the security service contract with the United States of America around August 2006, and provided security and security services to the United States Armed Forces Armed Forces from September 1, 2006 to November 30, 201. (2) The Plaintiff entered the Defendant on March 1, 2007 and retired on November 30, 201, when performing security and security services as the head of the office in the United States Armed Forces unit located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul.

B. The contract of employment between the plaintiff and the defendant in 2007

2. Working conditions (1) Types of employment: (2) Annual holiday allowances (annual) annual holiday allowances (annual) 11,520,000 won for overtime allowances (annual) 2,640,000 won for overtime allowances (annual) 600,500 won for 4,500,000 won for 1,140,000 won for 20,400,000 won for 20,400,000 won for 20,40,000 won for each month - monthly amount of payment shall be 12 equal to the amount obtained by subtracting the interim settled amount of retirement allowances.

- The allowances for overtime work and holiday work in excess of working hours are deemed to be included in overtime work allowances, and shall be deemed to have been included in the allowances paid on a comprehensive and regular basis.

(c) Type of employment and working hours: 40 hours a week, 8 hours a day, 40 hours a week work (4) , holidays, leaves, and vacations: Duties in charge of (6) applying the rules of employment and the Labor Standards Act mutatis mutandis: Facility expenses;

3. (1) A retirement allowance shall, in principle, be an amount equivalent to 30 days' average wage for each year of continuous service, and an interim settlement of the retirement allowance shall be made at the time one year after entry.

1) The Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded an employment contract on a yearly basis (Provided, That they concluded two times in 2010).

2) Of the labor contracts entered into between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff entered into a labor contract in 2007 (hereinafter “the labor contract in 2007”).

) Employment contracts concluded after 2008 (hereinafter “instant employment contracts”) with the employer.

The main contents of the Committee shall be as follows:

The labor contract of this case 2.2.