logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2016.09.23 2016고정11
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 19, 2011, the Defendant introduced F to the victim E by introducing “D” operated by the Defendant in the Gyeongbuk-gun C, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, “F will perform the work well,” and the Defendant made a false statement to the victim “F will perform the work immediately.” On February 21, 2011, the Defendant, from “H” operated by the victim in G around February 21, 201, may give the victim “F need to have 2,200,000 won and give the money first.”

F will make it possible for other Amers to do so at the same time.

The phrase “AC requires 500,000 won to give the money first,” and the phrase “F made a false statement to the victim that “F would give the payment first of all.”

However, even if the Defendant received the advance payment from the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intent to let F and other I work in H, and F did not have the intention to work in H.

On the same day, the Defendant received 2.7 million won from the damaged party to the agricultural bank account in the name of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with F and was given KRW 2.7 million by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

The defendant asserts that there is no fact that he/she acquired by fraud from the damaged person in collusion with F. The defendant's partial statement of the defendant, the defendant of some of the prosecution suspect interrogation protocol against F, a copy of the document of custody of cash in the police interrogation protocol against F, a copy of the document of custody of cash, a copy of the statement of self-reliance deposit transactions (A), a copy of the statement of deposit transactions (A), a copy of the passbook, and a copy of the passbook (J),

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following circumstances are recognized.

In other words, F is the first to pay the Defendant the advance payment of the existing establishment with the advance payment received at the first place of business and the first to the advance payment received at the second place of business.

arrow