A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from around 1998, was aware of the Defendant’s purchase of goods with victim D, which had been operating “C” stores at the EL branch store located in Guri-si in 198.

1. On February 13, 2009, the Defendant related to credit card settlement made a false statement to the effect that “C” stores of the victim D’s shop located in the 713-dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, purchased clothing, and “I will pay the victim the purchase price with a credit card instead of the credit card.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was unable to make a credit card due to bad credit standing, and the expense of 15 million won per month was disbursed to the skin management office operated by the Defendant at the time, and this expense was not possible, and even if the Defendant purchased clothing using the credit card of the victim due to the absence of any other specific assets, it was sufficiently predicted that the Defendant was not able to pay the price, and that it was impossible to pay it at the due date for the payment of the credit card.

Nevertheless, as seen above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, purchased minccot, etc. from the victim, and had the victim settle it by credit card in the name of Dong E of the victim, and by having the victim settle it by credit card under the name of Dong E of the victim's credit card and the victim's credit card, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the above amount by purchasing 52,577,970 won in total on 29 occasions, such as the list of crimes committed.

2. On June 30, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A” store “C,” the victim D, who borrowed money, shall be paid to the victim after the month.”

However, in fact, the defendant had been in the state of being kept up with the enemy at the time of being bad credit holders, and even if there was no other property and borrowed money from the victim, the defendant did not have the ability to repay the money on the date of repayment.