logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 04. 18. 선고 2016두34882 판결
쟁점주식을 저가로 인수한 것으로 보아 증여세를 부과한 처분은 정당한 것으로 보임[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court 2015Nu21377 (2016.02.04)

Title

The disposition imposing the gift tax by deeming that the shares at issue are acquired at a low price shall be deemed legitimate.

Summary

Although the disposal agency claims that there is no gift benefit due to a fall in the value of shares, it is not erroneous in the disposal of this case which the disposal agency assessed the value of the shares at the market price on the evaluation base date (donation date

Related statutes

Article 39 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2016Du3482 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing gift tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

The AA

Defendant-Appellee

00. Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court Decision 2015Nu21377 Decided 04, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The appellate brief filed by the appellant did not contain any statement in the grounds of appeal and did not submit the appellate brief within the statutory period. The appellate brief filed by the Plaintiff was received on March 30, 2016, which was later than the date on which the appellate brief was not timely filed. Accordingly, the appellate brief is dismissed pursuant to Article 429 of the Civil Procedure Act, Article 8 of the Administrative Litigation Act, and Article 5 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedures for Appeal, and the costs of the appeal are assessed against

arrow