Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics;

A. On November 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) taken the fluoral tobacco fluor at a fluoral area (hereinafter referred to as the “fluoral fluor”) around November 12, 2014; and (b) taken the fluoral tobacco fluor; and (c)

B. On April 19, 2015, the Defendant, around 22:00, smoked in a manner of gathering the marith of marijuana, putting the marith of the marith of the marith of the Masan-si, Ansan-si, by inserting the marith of the marith of the mariths

2. Around 06:40 on April 21, 2015, the Defendant driving a Donuri Culture and Arts Hospital located in the Sonuridong-dong-dong, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, which was located in the front of the Sonsan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, which was driving a Donsan-si car without a vehicle driver’s license on the front of the road after the Seoul Urban Culture and Arts Center.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute entered in the register of driver's licenses, written appraisal of suspect A’s side, investigation report (e.g., marijuana market price and report on the calculation of additional collection charges);

1. Article 61 (1) 4 (a) and Article 3 subparagraph 10 (a) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (the point of smoking marijuana) concerning criminal facts, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and selection of fines for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant committed a second offense during the period of suspended execution for the same type of crime, which is disadvantageous to the defendant, or the frequency of the crime in this case. The defendant shows his intent to keep the criminal in mind, and the defendant appears to have committed a second offense in response to the crime in this case. The defendant appears to have contributed significantly to the arrest of the accomplice by actively cooperating with the investigation. The sentencing case of other similar cases and the sentencing case of this case and this court shall be sentenced to the High