beta
Text
1. Defendant C’s KRW 7,00,000 and its related amount are 5% per annum from October 20, 2014 to April 22, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties is a local government subject to the Local Autonomy Act. The plaintiff B is the market at the time of the plaintiff, and the defendant corporation's channel (hereinafter "the defendant channel") is a broadcasting business operator operating cable TV broadcasting "channel", and the defendant C is the former member of the National Assembly.
B. The broadcast report 1 of this case’s broadcast channel operator E, Defendant C, and F attorney-at-law on October 17, 2014 (hereinafter “instant event”) in the channelA’s “D” program broadcasted around 13:30 on October 20, 2014.
(A) broadcast the same content as indicated in the separate sheet in the form of dividing the interview and debate as to A’s host of the event, responsibility, etc. in relation to a fall accident occurred in the hall (hereinafter “the instant broadcast report”).
2) Of the instant broadcast reports, the part concerning the plaintiffs' issues is as follows. A) Defendant C: (A) at this time, at this time, Defendant C was 5 million won (support for the instant event) and there is a condition in lieu of supporting the said KRW 5 million. The current market owner of the Republic of Korea is de facto holding this case’s agreement with each other. It may be apparent that it is legally accepted by the contract. However, in view of the foregoing, the part regarding the instant broadcast reports is the common best (hereinafter referred to as “the first report”).
b) F attorney-at-law: The defendant C, why is why is why is why is and why is why is, and why is why is, a public performance that has not been used in the G square (hereinafter referred to as "the second report"): (the plaintiff B) the market is going through and is too large to be less than others in the surrounding area. Therefore, the plaintiff B, as a result, unilaterally, through a private contract, or is employed or employed (hereinafter referred to as "third report") in the same case as a business conducted in the city to a person who has become a letter of self-contest or a person who has a dispute over North Korea.
(D) Defendant C: (Plaintiff B) self-help.