logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.13 2014가합45602
정정.손배
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a specialized processing company of the chickens, and the Defendant is a broadcasting business entity that operates the cable TV broadcasting “channelA”.

B. At around C 23:00, the Defendant broadcasted “D” in the channel A “B” program as shown in attached Table 2.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant broadcast report”). The instant broadcast report included news coverage images of the processing company’s place of work, including the Plaintiff’s place of work, at a total of four chickenss. However, the Plaintiff was 2nd among them.

C. Of the broadcast reports of this case, the part on the issue of the Plaintiff is as follows.

1) (Report to the Plaintiff’s Place of Work) It is the honor that the ice would be put in to remove the lush in which the circulation period expired and to make the ice tank in order to make it tank (hereinafter referred to as “first report”).

2) (2) According to the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act, I expressly stipulate that the imported livestock products are sanitaryly operated.

Therefore, this is recommended to manage the chickens in a sanitary manner so that the chickens and chickens may not be faced with.

They exceeded all the chills covered by our Republic of Korea, and they were working under water in the state of contact with the chickens and chickens.

(hereinafter referred to as "second Report") . 3 Haca processing company and four (A company, B company, C company, and D company) are found. Among them, two (B company, D company) among them are detected of food poisoning germs that may cause the death (hereinafter referred to as "third report").

4) (4) (Now since the end of the period until the end of the period, on the part of the other company’s workplace, reports a string on which the worker’s tobacco is unsatisfy and satisfyed).

(hereinafter referred to as “fourth Report”). 【No ground for recognition”, “No ground for recognition”, and the video or description of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Each of the instant reports asserted by the Plaintiff is as follows.

arrow