The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

In light of the circumstances where the crime of this case is bad, only KRW 2 million out of the amount of damage, and the remainder of damage is not repaid, the court below made a sentence that falls under the lower limit of the sentencing criteria in consideration of the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc.

In the economic difficulties of the defendant, the third day of the parking lot, the day of the night, and the person who is the defendant's will have been living in good faith. It is recognized that the defendant's will have the defendant's preference, but the above sentencing conditions have changed significantly in the trial.

In light of the above, it is difficult to see that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable to consider the sentencing as a whole.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.