The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The decision of the court below, which judged unfair sentencing (the defendant withdrawn his argument other than unfair sentencing on the first trial date of the first trial of the trial of the first instance) based on the summary of the grounds for appeal (the defendant has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and the defendant committed the crime of this case even before and after the lapse of the repeated crime committed by committing the same kind of crime after being sentenced to imprisonment and having been sentenced to imprisonment, was committed during the repeated crime period for the same kind of crime, under the circumstances that the defendant committed the crime of this case, the defendant reflects his own crime, was agreed with the victim of the obstruction of business, and the degree of power of each of the crimes of this case is not serious, shall be taken into consideration in light of the favorable circumstances, such as the defendant's age and sexual behavior

The above sentencing conditions have changed in the court of the other hand.

There is no reason to see the above sentencing, and when comprehensively considering the above sentencing, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.