The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Sentencing sentencing on the gist of reasons for appeal

2. The lower court determined a sentence within the scope of the sentencing criteria, taking into account the favorable circumstances, given that the Defendant is a repeated offender of the same kind, and the injury was not recovered, the Defendant’s confessions and reflects, the unsound growth environment, the process of surgery with the captain, etc., and the fact that the need for medical treatment and support for game addiction could arise, and the sentence was determined within the scope of the sentencing criteria.

The appellate court, compared to the first instance court, has no change in the conditions of sentencing, and the first instance sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect the first instance sentencing judgment.

In the trial, the above sentencing conditions have changed.

There is no reason to see the above sentencing, and when comprehensively considering the above sentencing, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.