logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 10. 27. 선고 2016다238069 판결
취득원인이 무효로 취득세 부과처분, 이에 따른 농어촌특별세에 하자가 있는 경우 부당이득의 법리가 적용되는지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Na2012975 (Law No. 16.30)

Title

Whether the legal principle of unjust enrichment applies to the imposition of acquisition tax which becomes null and void and the subsequent defect in the special rural development tax.

Summary

It cannot be viewed that the taxation disposition that misleads the facts of taxation requirements is null and void as a matter of course.

Related statutes

Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

Cases

2016Da238069 Undue gains

The Intervenor succeeding the Plaintiff

bb

Defendant-Appellee

Republic of Korea Overseas

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court-2016-Na2012975 (Law No. 16.30)

Imposition of Judgment

oly 27, 2016

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff succeeding intervenor.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

arrow