1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 296,831,309 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from November 4, 2009 to October 8, 2013; and (b).

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Approval and public notice of the project - Road project (construction work on the substitution roads for national highways within the jurisdiction of Jinju) - Notice of the Busan Regional Land Management Office No. 2007-79, May 1, 2007 - Project operator: Defendant;

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation on September 10, 200 - Compensation subject to expropriation, and compensation subject to expropriation: The object of expropriation is as indicated in the item column for objects subject to expropriation as a result of the appraisal in attached Form 2 (in case of objects subject to expropriation compensation, it refers to the obstacles of this case, and in case of trees among the obstacles of this case, it refers to the trees of this case), and compensation for expropriation is KRW 595,865,830.

- Commencement date of expropriation: - An appraisal corporation: a national appraisal corporation (Appraiser B) and the Korea Appraisal Board (Appraiser C).

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection on January 14, 2010 - Contents of the ruling: The above compensation for expropriation increased to KRW 635,606,500, and the specific compensation amount is as stated in the column for compensation for adjudication on objection as a result of the attached Table 2 appraisal.

- An appraisal corporation: A certified public appraisal corporation (appraisalD) and a light appraisal corporation (appraisal E);

D. The result of each commission of appraisal to the appraiser F, G (hereinafter the above acceptance ruling and its objection) in this Court is as follows: (a) the ruling appraiser, F, the first court appraiser, the second court appraiser G, the second court appraiser; (b) the ruling appraiser's appraisal results; (c) the first court appraiser's appraisal results; and (d) the second court appraiser's appraisal results; and (d) the second court appraiser's appraisal results; and (c) compensation for losses: the same is as the amount of the court's appraisal results in Attached Table 2; and (d) the amount of the second court appraisal.

E. The Defendant intended to pay the Plaintiff the compensation for the above acceptance ruling and the increased portion of compensation in the objection ruling, but did not receive it. On October 28, 2009, the Defendant deposited KRW 595,865,830 of the above acceptance ruling, and KRW 39,740,670 of the increased compensation in the objection ruling on February 19, 2010, respectively.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 2-1, 2, 2.